Formalism Rosetta

Concepts first, formalism second — but the formalism still matters when you open a book. The same object wears different clothes in the operator, path-integral, and diagrammatic languages. This table is a translator: find the row, read across.

A living reference — rows are added as topics need them.

ObjectOperator (second quantization)Path integral (functional)Diagrammatic
Building blockcreation / annihilation operators c†, cGrassmann (or complex) fields ψ̄, ψexternal & internal lines
Free dynamicsH₀ = Σₖ ε(k) c†ₖ cₖquadratic action ψ̄(∂τ + ε)ψthe bare line G₀
InteractionU n↑ n↓quartic term in the action Sthe vertex
Partition function ZTr e^(−βH)∫ 𝒟[ψ̄,ψ] e^(−S)exp(Σ connected vacuum diagrams)
Propagator G−⟨T c(τ) c†(0)⟩⟨ψ(τ) ψ̄(0)⟩ functional averagedressed line G = G₀ + G₀ Σ G
Self-energy ΣDyson: G⁻¹ = G₀⁻¹ − Σ1PI part of the two-point functionsum of one-particle-irreducible insertions
Susceptibility χ⟨T A(τ) A(0)⟩ (connected)δ²lnZ / δh²bubbles + ladders (Bethe–Salpeter)
Expectation ⟨Ô⟩Tr(ρ Ô)∫ 𝒟φ O e^(−S) / Zdiagrams with one O insertion

See these objects at work in the Green's functions and diagrammatics method pages, or read the ethos on why we stay formalism-agnostic.