The Mott Transition in DMFT: Phase Diagram and V₂O₃
Running the DMFT+IPT loop on the Bethe lattice traces the interaction-driven Mott transition — the three-peak spectral structure, the Fermi-liquid self-energy, the coexistence region with critical interactions U_c1 ≈ 2.54 and U_c2 ≈ 3.27, and a (U,T) phase diagram whose first-order line and critical endpoint reproduce the paramagnetic metal–insulator transition of V₂O₃.
Methods Dynamical mean-field theory
With the DMFT formalism and the IPT solver in place, we now run the loop on the Bethe lattice and follow the half-filled Hubbard model across the Mott transition.
Extreme limits
We first check the two solvable limits against earlier results. At
The quantum phase transition
Fixing
This spectral function is not just a computed curve — it is measured.
A Fermi-liquid criterion from the self-energy
The self-energy cleanly distinguishes the phases. In the metal, near
Order parameters and the coexistence region
We characterize both the metal→insulator (MIT) and insulator→metal (IMT)
transitions, scanning
The DMFT phase diagram and V₂O₃
Collecting the critical interactions across temperature gives the canonical Mott
phase diagram in the
Although obtained in the idealized infinite-dimensional limit, this topology
matches experiment. Cr-doped
Conclusion
We followed the metal–insulator transition of the half-filled Hubbard model from
every useful vantage point. We set the physical stage with the high-
Analytically, two limits: a weak-coupling mean-field decoupling gave an
interaction-induced Slater gap from Fermi-surface nesting and antiferromagnetic
order; a strong-coupling expansion in
To reach the intermediate regime, DMFT with the IPT solver gave the
spectral function’s three-peak structure, the spectral-weight transfer to the
Hubbard bands, and the first-order Mott transition with coexistence and hysteresis.
From the self-energy and spectral curvature we extracted the critical interactions
and built a
In sum, the Hubbard model with DMFT provides a unified description of itinerant and localized phases in correlated electrons — a foundation for extensions to doped systems, cluster DMFT, or multiorbital models closer to real materials. The full report, with all references and additional detail, is on the Report page.
Prerequisites
Related in this subject
- Cuprates and the Mott ProblemWhy high-temperature superconductivity forced condensed-matter physics to take strong electron correlation seriously — and why the story begins with an insulator that band theory says should be a metal.
- The Hubbard ModelThe minimal model of reference for the cuprates — one hopping amplitude and one on-site repulsion — together with its particle–hole symmetry, Green's functions, and the two limits (atomic and non-interacting) that already reveal the Mott insulator.
- Weak Coupling: Mean-Field Theory and the Slater InsulatorStarting from the non-interacting limit, a mean-field decoupling of the Hubbard interaction with staggered magnetization gives an antiferromagnetic two-band insulator. Solving the self-consistent gap equation reveals a Slater gap that opens exponentially at weak coupling and crosses over to the Mott gap Δ → U/2 at strong coupling.
- Strong Coupling: Perturbation Theory and SuperexchangeIn the opposite limit U ≫ t, treating hopping as a perturbation and projecting out doubly occupied sites with a Schrieffer–Wolff transformation maps the half-filled Hubbard model onto the antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model, with superexchange J = 4t²/U.
- Dynamical Mean-Field Theory and the IPT SolverDMFT maps the Hubbard model onto a self-consistent Anderson impurity problem — exact in infinite dimensions — retaining the full frequency dependence of the self-energy that the perturbative limits miss. With Landau Fermi-liquid theory for interpretation and the Iterated Perturbation Theory solver for the impurity, it tracks the metal across to the Mott insulator in one framework.