The minimal model of reference for the cuprates — one hopping amplitude and one on-site repulsion — together with its particle–hole symmetry, Green's functions, and the two limits (atomic and non-interacting) that already reveal the Mott insulator.
By Abdulrahman AnterUniversité Paris-Saclay · LPS, Orsay
The Hubbard model is the standard theoretical framework for correlated electrons
in cuprates. It is a tight-binding model in which electrons are largely localized
on atomic sites and move only by tunnelling, with hopping amplitude .
Electron–electron interactions enter as an on-site Coulomb repulsion , on a
square lattice of copper atoms with a single active orbital per site — the
single-band Hubbard model. Working in the grand canonical ensemble on
sites, with ,
where the last term is the chemical potential .
Nearest-neighbour hopping between copper sites with amplitude −t.Two electrons on the same site cost an interaction energy U.
Pictorial representation of the first two terms of the Hubbard Hamiltonian (Scalettar, 2016).
The justification: in-plane Cu–Cu distances are much shorter than the spacing to
the oxygen atoms in the insulating layers, so the essential physics happens within
the planes; the spacer layers act as charge reservoirs. Each
copper hosts a shell whose near-degeneracy is split by the crystal field,
leaving a single active orbital. Hopping is actually mediated by the bridging
oxygens, but is conventionally written as direct Cu–Cu hopping.
The intra-plane Cu–O distances are much shorter than the spacing between planes and the insulating layers (Civelli, 2007).
Particle–hole symmetry
Bipartite lattices — such as the square and cubic lattices — split into two
sublattices and so that every site of one neighbours
only sites of the other. This structure naturally supports antiferromagnetic
order: spin-up and spin-down electrons can occupy separate sublattices without
violating the Pauli principle.
Sublattices 𝒜 (red) and ℬ (green): every site neighbours only the other sublattice.Spin-up and spin-down electrons occupy separate sublattices — antiferromagnetic order.
The bipartite square lattice and the antiferromagnetic order it naturally supports (Scalettar, 2016).
Introduce the particle–hole transformation (PHT):
The arrow means “replace the left operator by the right one in ”. The factor
depending on the sublattice of site ; for nearest neighbours
on opposite sublattices, . The operator identities follow:
The terms of the Hamiltonian therefore transform as
describes the dynamics of holes; is invariant under PHT only if
. Consider now the equivalent symmetric form of the Hamiltonian,
which differs from the standard form only by a shift of and a constant, since
In this form both kinetic and interaction terms are PHT-invariant; only the
chemical-potential term changes sign (up to a constant),
so the Hamiltonian is PHT-invariant only at . Defining the average site
occupancy
PHT sends , i.e. .
Because the system is particle–hole symmetric at , , hence
That is, corresponds to half-filling.
Green’s functions
Green’s functions are the correlation functions at the centre of many-body theory.
Labelling the eigenstates of the full by , the Green’s function (GF) is
where is the time-ordering operator (not temperature), e.g. for a generic
operator ,
and the expectation value is taken in the ground state () or the canonical
ensemble (finite ). Operators evolve in the Heisenberg picture,
The closely related spectral function, central to experimental observables, is
where is the Fourier transform of the retarded Green’s function
Here is the anticommutator (fermions) or commutator (bosons),
and is the Heaviside step. is a resolved density of
states — the probability of finding a particle in state with excitation
energy . Below we compute and two ways: via the imaginary-time
(Matsubara) formalism, and via the spectral (Lehmann) representation.
The single-site (atomic) limit
To gain insight into the deceptively simple but analytically hard Hubbard model,
take — no hopping — giving the single-site Hubbard model,
Here the number operators commute with and with each other,
, so is separable and each
site is analysed independently:
This is the atomic limit of the Anderson impurity model (AIM), describing an
isolated ion:
where and create conduction and
localized electrons, is the hybridization,
the conduction dispersion, the impurity level, and the on-site repulsion.
The AIM atomic limit is
Rewriting
the last term is a constant shift, and the two Hamiltonians coincide under
. We proceed with . With a single site, the
configurations are
(first/second entry = number of spin-up/down electrons), with energies , ,
, . The energy to add or remove an electron from the two-fold
degenerate level is
Provided , i.e. , the singly occupied states
lie lowest: the ground state is a localized single electron carrying a magnetic
moment, with charge transport suppressed — already the hallmark of a Mott
insulator.
The Mott insulator: an insight
Thermodynamics starts from the partition function
The four atomic-state energies, in Hubbard parameters, are
At these simplify to a particle–hole symmetric spectrum,
and the partition function becomes
The average occupation follows,
At the system is half-filled, . Plotting for
at various temperatures shows, at low , a plateau pinned at around
: the Mott gap. Adding or removing an electron costs energy of order
; raising blurs the gap.
Average site occupancy ρ(μ) in the single-site Hubbard model (t=0) at U=4: the plateau at ρ=1 near μ=0 is the Mott gap.
The spectral function (single site)
It is convenient to work on the imaginary axis and analytically continue to the
real axis afterwards.
Imaginary-time approach. The Matsubara Green’s function is
with the imaginary-time ordering operator and .
At ,
Fourier transforming with ,
For fermions only odd Matsubara frequencies appear; using ,
Analytic continuation gives the retarded function
and Cauchy’s identity
yields the spectral function
Lehmann representation. The same result follows from the Lehmann form, which
expresses through the eigenstates of the full interacting ,
At , only and contribute, giving
matching the earlier and the same . The two Dirac ‘s are
the minimal excitation energies to add or remove an electron from the
singly-occupied ground state, : charge transport requires overcoming a
finite barrier, so the system is insulating.
Single-site Hubbard spectral function at U=4: electron/hole excitations cost ±U/2 — the energy of adding/removing an electron at half-filling.
Finally, the single-site spin-up occupation,
which as ; by particle–hole symmetry ,
so , the lowest-energy half-filled configuration.
The non-interacting limit ()
In the opposite limit the Hamiltonian reduces to tight-binding,
Lattice-translation invariance lets us diagonalize in momentum space,
Using ,
i.e. in compact form
with lattice constant . The dispersion gives a density of states
(with normalized by the Brillouin-zone volume) that diverges
logarithmically at — a van Hove singularity. At half-filling,
electrons fill of the spin-resolved states, so band theory predicts a
conductor.
Dispersion ε(k) in the first Brillouin zone.Fermi surfaces ξ(k)=0 for various μ: a square at μ=0 with perfect nesting at q=(π,π).
The non-interacting band structure: dispersion across the Brillouin zone, and Fermi surfaces showing perfect nesting at μ=0.Density of states of the non-interacting 2D square-lattice Hubbard model, with the logarithmic van Hove singularity at ε=0 (Gaussian broadening σ=0.05t).
The Fermi surface exhibits, at , perfect nesting
at : large segments map onto each other under translation by
. This enhances the susceptibility to antiferromagnetic ordering at
and motivates the mean-field treatment of the magnetization in the
weak-coupling topic.
The spectral function ()
The retarded Green’s function is
with spectral function
sharply peaked at the quasiparticle energy — the spectral weight
of a non-interacting particle is a single coherent -peak. Restoring is
the whole story of this subject: it is what turns this sharp band metal into a Mott
insulator, the subject of the weak-
and strong-coupling topics, and
the DMFT study that follows.